Article in the Harvard Post

http://www.wickedlocal.com/harvard/features/x650534274/Feists-CD-to-raise-funds-for-Harvard-Town-Hall

Posted in Press | Leave a comment

Spotlight

Pleased to be spotlighted in the MakeMusic Finale blog, where I unabashedly hawk the Fantasy Monologue CD.

Posted in Marketing, Technology | Leave a comment

Harvard Press Interview!

Interviewed in the Harvard Press about this project!

Posted in Press | Leave a comment

Where to Get the Fantasy Monologue CD

The Fantasy Monologue CD is now available for sale at the Harvard General Store. This is my preferred place for people to buy it. Get some wine or a cappuccino, while you’re at it.

You can also get it online at CDBaby.com. This is a really good service for independent recording artists, and they distribute it to a variety of online and physical vendors.

Digital files are available for download via iTunes and Amazon.

To listen for free, you can go to Bandcamp.

Sales of the Fantasy Monologue CD benefit the restoration of the Town of Harvard Town Hall.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Like Everything

Big news is that the Fantasy Monologue CDs have arrived from the duplicator, nicely shrink-wrapped, and I’m getting them all sent to where then need to go in order for them to be available for sale. Soon, I will be able to publish some links here, once they are ready.

Meanwhile, I’ve been listening to the recording, after having a break from it for a few weeks, and am feeling a bit like it’s my favorite album. There, I said it. That voice on there sounds just like the voice that sings in my head. Those lyrics seem like the writer really understands me, from the inside out. And the musicians on there play with such warmth and mastery and thoughtfulness, they somehow feel like they are my personal friends. I mean, they are, and of course I wrote and sang the songs, so this all kind of makes sense, in my case, but I hope everyone has the same reaction. Especially you!

What I’m struggling with lately is filling in requests by various databases for marketing information. Like, one question is “What three other artists is your music like?”

It’s a little tough to answer this because we’re simply trying to create honest music that feels authentic and serves the songs well, rather than trying to sound like someone else, or make it conform to a “genre,” which is really just a marketing construct to facilitate sales in record stores. And it’s a little weird to say that I’m like so-and-so, because everyone else is a towering giant, and I am lowly worm (wallow wallow).

But I understand that such associations are helpful to people looking for music to listen to, so they need to be considered, especially for emerging artists. So, what three are we most like?

One is easy: Tom Waits, especially his early work (Closing Time, Small Change, The Heart of Saturday Night, etc.). And what contemporary songwriter doesn’t want to be like Tom Waits?

After him, it gets harder.

A lot of artist names were bantered about while we were building soundscapes for these songs: Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Bert Jansch, Alison Krauss, Fleetwood Mac, Fritz Kreisler, and others. But our resulting sound isn’t much like any of them, mostly—at least, not for very long. Maybe a guitar part or violin solo here and there, or the vibe of one song here might be like one obscure song way over there, but it’s pretty difficult to say, “If you liked their album, you’re sure to like ours.”

Someone recently said my songwriting and vocals bring Leonard Cohen to mind. That was interesting to me, as I’d never listened to him at all, so I did some research. He’s an amazing talent, and sure, I would hop on that bandwagon, if I could catch it. It’s nice to hear another bass singer. That said, I find his approach to lyrics (not to mention orchestration) somewhat unfathomable. He goes to some scary places that I would run away from in terror, if they ever occurred to me. Not that I don’t appreciate his work. But man, that cat is far out!

Two other voices have been suggested to me as being somehow similar to mine are Johnny Cash and Jim Morrison. I’m a great admirer of both of their music, but also find it to be utterly unfathomable. I like it, but I can’t get my head around it, and can’t imagine creating anything like anything they ever did.

All of us sing fairly low, though. Maybe that’s the tie that binds?

Anyhow, I think one of the strengths of Fantasy Monologue is the eclectic breath of colors it explores. Overall, it mostly stays within the wide realm of acoustic influenced alternative rock. Music that could conceivably fit inside that vague marketing characterization potentially includes a fairly wide expanse, from Johnny Cash to Pink Floyd to whatever, but that’s my story and I’m sticking to it, even if it is only about sixty-seven percent true.

I feel like I’m being unhelpful to the databases. But the art of this recording feels well served, so I’m not losing much sleep over copping out with the genre or associations.

Posted in Influences, Marketing, Status update | 1 Comment

CD is Released!

I’m pleased to report that the Fantasy Monologue CD is printed and available for sale at the Harvard General Store! You can also get it from this site now, and soon, from CD Baby, Amazon, and various other places. Click here for details on buying options.

Profits from its sales will help support the restoration of Harvard Town Hall. A lot of people have done me a lot of favors in the process of getting this recording done, and this will help keep the good karma flowing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Screwing with My Voice

Singers of my sorry ilk need electronic help.

It’s an odd state of affairs, in music now, where the electronics are good enough that they can make a mediocre performance significantly less mediocre. Engineers can move stuff around, improve the timing, make notes different pitches, make tracks sound like they were recorded in a different sized rooms (closet, bathroom, cathedral, whatever), make it warmer or brighter or richer or browner, all at the easy swoosh of a mouse.

While electronic sound processing can make something sound better, it still can’t turn something bad into something good. Which is really unfortunate.

The process of my learning about this was somewhat excruciating. I’m a sort of accidental singer. No, not meaning that even in C major, I sound like I’m singing accidentals, or even that I sound like my voice box was in some sort of horrible accident. I mean that I found myself singing on this album out of necessity; I just didn’t have anyone else to do it. And unfortunately, I’m a lousy singer! I’m cheap, though, and I like my own lyrics, so I got the gig.

As Nik and I were recording what we hoped would be the final versions of the tracks, and were forced to take a hard look at my limitations, we fell into the seductive embrace of Melodyne, a program that corrects pitch. Nik calls her my girlfriend. It’s a relationship built more on anguish and toxic codependency and mutual torment than on love. (See CD tracks 1, 5, 7….)

The tracks that were resulting from this pitch-correction treatment, while more in tune, wound up driving me totally bonkers, a lot of the time. Certain notes, certain timbres just came out robotic sounding—just a little weird. Many younger contemporary singers are building their careers on this robotic sound, but it isn’t at all right for what I’m trying to do. More subtly, on some notes, Nik couldn’t figure out exactly what pitch I intended, as practically anything would sound better than what I actually did, and his coin flip landed on the wrong side up. As a songwriter, even the fear of this was nearly driving me to drink. I was sounding “better,” but in a worse sort of way.

After a lot of back and forth and back and forth, with me saying, “Your tinkering is making my voice sound unnatural,” and him saying, “Well, you sang it almost a full step flat,” we found that instead of relying on pitch-correction technology, the more effective way to get a better result was often for me to just rerecord, and sing in @!!*& tune, for a change. To me, this is a near impossible task. But I believe that my tracks are currently sounding more or less in tune, especially where it matters. (Thank you, Louis Armstrong and Bob Dylan for paving the way for a wide swath of what is considered a technically acceptable singing style…..)

Now, while the vocals on this recording might sound okay, don’t be confused that this is due to any skill at singing, on my part. Recordings are fictions. Some of these vocal tracks took me over thirty takes, to get. A “good” singer would never do that many takes, and I think it’s only because I can record on my own, in my garret studio, that I am able to do this. Frank Sinatra would often get something usable (i.e., a classic recording beloved by millions of people) in one take. I can’t imagine doing that.

Some notes are still tweaked, on here. It’s the way of the world. People like me need to be pitch corrected. Even people who are a lot better than me get pitch corrected. But hopefully, the digital fingerprints are finally more or less invisible.

Posted in Creative process, Technology | Leave a comment

Album Song Order

Today’s meditation is song order on the album. One could argue that best practice for song order has evolved, over the past few decades. You could make the case that it has long made sense for albums to include 12 songs, for reasons based on copyright law, though this length also feels about right in terms of how many songs by the same artist one can stand to listen to at a time. From the dawn of LPs until the CD, it made sense to divide these into two groups of six: one set for each side of the LP. Then, when CDs came out, you could have a longer set with no need to break them into two groups, as there was no need to flip the album over. And then with the rise of MP3s, album order doesn’t matter any more because we’re back in the land of singles, and nobody listens to whole albums all at once, and when they do, they just hit Shuffle anyway.

None of this is actually seeming right to me. I’m inclined to think of the album in terms of it being a composite work, though, not a haphazard stash of singles. Personally, I listen to albums all the way through, and I despise Shuffle. When I’m listening to an artist, I want to stick with them for a while. So, I reject out of hand the “single” argument.

Then there’s the question of one big group or two little ones. I’m inclined to stick with the two group idea. The human attention span is good for about 25 minutes tops, which corresponds reasonably well to the old LP two-group nature. Concerts are usually divided into halves, with intermissions. In any musical setting, it’s nice to have a point of pause, and then come back.

Which means, nothing has really changed, in terms of how songs on an album should be grouped.

I’m thinking of a “golden arches” shape to the song order, with two groups, each with something of a dramatic arch, though the shape of each hump remains a puzzle. My staff of strategic advisers (primarily Mike King and George Howard, music marketing gurus, and Jonathan Wyner, mastering engineer) have suggested a few considerations that I am currently pondering. I’ve distilled them into the following guiding principles that resonate best with me at the moment.

1. The first song should be the strongest song that is most emblematic of the artist’s character and style.

2. The first five songs shouldn’t include any songs that are among the weaker songs in the album, and three of them should be the very strongest songs on there.

3. Mix up song keys and tempos, and avoid having too many similar ones sequentially next to each other.

4. Figure out which songs are the clunkers. Hide them towards the end or leave them out entirely. We’ve killed two songs. It hurt at the moment of decision-making, but I’m over it now. The set list is currently thirteen songs long, and about 41 minutes. That’s about right, and I don’t consider anything on there a proper “clunker,” at this point.

5. The last song should feel like an ending.

I’ve created a chart that has key, meter, tempo, density of instrumentation, and mood, cut them all up, and am shuffling them around on a tabletop, considering different types of dramatic shape. Then, I’m trying out the order in iTunes, feeling how the transitions are between them.

It seems a balancing act between trying to keep sounds fresh while maintaining an intuitive connection between songs. Once all this thinking about mechanics is done, it seems a matter of finding the right way to thread a narrative together, that respects these various technical parameters and still somehow makes intuitive sense. It’s a journey…..

Song order

Posted in Creative process | 3 Comments

Plymouth Adventure

Today’s excellent adventure was to Plymouth, to record the dulcet grooving and occasional honking of Sue Lindsay’s baritone saxophone, for the tune “The Moment I Found You.” To record it, she essentially snuck us into her husband’s exquisite man-cave—a fully stocked and brilliant appointed secret Irish pub in their basement. Stephen Lindsay is an exceptional finish carpenter, as well as a brilliant singer/guitarist, and it is all mahogany, with pub decorations saying things like “Good wine still isn’t beer.” This private sanctuary of his should be featured in a coffee-table book about man caves.

Anyhow, the track is turning out great, between the bari solo and the freight train noises. The day started out on rocky ground, with the computer corrupting my file of the sax part I wrote, and I had to scramble to recreate it. I’d exported a PDF a few days previously, and had Finale read the scan, which might have been better than starting from scratch, but it introduced a host of rhythm mistakes into it, which we didn’t discover until Sue started playing. So much for trying to pass myself off as a Finale expert and careful editor….

There was an auspicious morning omen, though: a family of turkeys wandering on my street.

Lunch was good at the Blue-Eyed Crab: oysters, clams, scallop salad, iced tea, and hot coffee. Looking forward to a meeting at M-Works tomorrow, to get a reality check regarding our mixes. We listened to twelve mixes in the car, and they are sounding really good to me. That completes all tracking except for one tune, which we are squeezing it at the last minute, to replace a tune that Nik hates. Now, his new most-hated tune is one of my favorites, so I think we’re likely arriving at the final set list.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Reaching towards the Endgame

Richard Bach said, “Argue for your limitations, and sure enough, they become yours.”

That’s rattled around in my head since high school. (I think only high school students quote Richard Bach.) Today, my response is, “Thanks, but please go jump in the lake.”

I mean that with all due respect, as a suggested refreshing diversion, because I can’t think in those terms right now.

The reason is that if I don’t sometimes accept certain limitations as fact, I will never actually accomplish anything. My attitude towards art is more disposable, lately. I see benefit in going through the whole creative process, end to end, from initial concept to publication, and then repeating it over and over, rather than endlessly spinning around in a fruitless attempt to make something perfect. Because nothing is ever perfect. Never ever ever. “Really good” has got to be good enough for me, these days.

And so it is, with the endgame process of our CD. We’re tucking songs in their digital beds, telling them to stop talking, and then turning out the light.

Good night, songs. I said GOOD NIGHT!

We’ve now got about ten songs fully recorded and mostly mixed, nearly ready to be mastered, though a couple are probably going to be tweaked a bit more.

Another two or three are awaiting some additional recorded tracks, which will involve some interesting field trips that I look forward to blogging about.

We just decided to kill one tune and replace it with a new one, which I had actually started writing in part because I wanted to start working on our second album. But it works better on this than the tune we were originally planning, so we’ll to try it. I have to work up the courage to play keyboards on it, which is a bit intimidating to me. We’ll see how that goes.

The end-game process of this project is fraught with delights and miseries. The low-hanging fruit has long been picked, and what we have now is coming to terms with many of the thorny issues that we’ve been avoiding addressing for a long time. Some of these are torture, like trying to arrive at what I would consider to be the best vocal parts that I’m capable of making, which one could argue are pretty far from perfect. Then, there are occasional gifts, like some of the new instrumental parts, which greatly expand and improve upon my original song concepts.

Deadlines help. We’re aiming to be done by the end of August. Because we have a new project to start. I don’t know anything about it yet, but I know that we really need to get going on it.

Posted in Creative process, Status update | Leave a comment